BABAR Publications

Detailed Index as of April 24, 2024 20:55

PUB-10/006 Search for b->u transitions in B- -> DK- and B- -> D*K- Decays
Doc Type Journal Papers
Record Created March 1, 2010
SLAC-PUB
SLAC-PUB-14181  No citations
Preprint # 1006.4241 [hep-ex]
Accession Code DT10778
First Author delAmoSanchez
Abstract
content_type = "application/octet-stream"
user_agent   = "Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)"
moz          = "Mozilla/5.0 "
moz_version  = "5"

We report results from an updated study of the suppressed decays
$B^- \to D K^-$ and $B^- \to D^* K^-$ followed by $D\to K^+
\pi^-$, where $D^{(*)}$ indicates a $D^{(*)0}$ or a $\bar
D^{(*)0}$ meson, and $D^* \to D \pi^0$ or $D^* \to D \gamma$.
These decays are sensitive to the CKM unitarity triangle angle
$\gamma$ due to interference between the $b\rightarrow c$
transition $B^- \to D^{(*)0}K^-$ followed by the doubly
Cabibbo-suppressed decay $D^0 \to K^+\pi^-$, and the $b\rightarrow
u$ transition $B^- \to \bar D^{(*)0}K^-$ followed by the
Cabibbo-favored decay $\bar D^0 \to K^+\pi^-$. We also report an
analysis of the decay $B^- \to D^{(*)} \pi^-$ with the $D$
decaying into the doubly Cabibbo-suppressed mode $D \to K^+\pi^-$.
Our results are based on 467 million $\Upsilon (4S) \to B \bar B$
decays collected with the BaBar detector at SLAC. We measure the
ratios ${\cal R}^{(*)}$ of the suppressed ($[K^+\pi^-]_D
K^-/\pi^-$) to favored ($[K^-\pi^+]_D K^-/\pi^-$) branching
fractions as well as the $CP$ asymmetries ${\cal A}^{(*)}$ of
those modes. We see indications of signals for the $B^-\to D K^-$
and $B^-\to D^*_{D\pi^0}K^-$ suppressed modes, with statistical
significances of 2.1 and 2.2$\sigma$, respectively, and we
measure:
$$ {\cal R}_{DK} = (1.1\pm 0.6 \pm 0.2)\times 10^{-2},\ {\cal A}_{DK} = -0.86 \pm 0.47 \ ^{+0.12}_{-0.16},$$
$$ {\cal R}^*_{(D \pi^0)K} = (1.8\pm 0.9 \pm 0.4)\times 10^{-2},\ {\cal A}^*_{(D \pi^0)K} = +0.77 \pm 0.35\pm 0.12,$$
$$ {\cal R}^*_{(D \gamma)K} = (1.3\pm 1.4\pm 0.8 )\times 10^{-2},\ {\cal A}^*_{(D \gamma)K} = +0.36 \pm 0.94\ ^{+0.25}_{-0.41},$$
where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is
systematic. We use a frequentist approach to obtain  the magnitude
of the ratio $r_B \equiv |A(B^- \to \bar D^0 K^-) / A(B^- \to D^0
K^-)|= (9.5^{+5.1}_{-4.1})\%$, with $r_B<16.7\%$ at 90\%
confidence level. In the case of $B^- \to D^* K^-$ we find
$r^*_B\equiv |A(B^- \to \bar D^*0 K^-) / A(B^- \to D^*0 K^-)|=
(9.6^{+3.5}_{-5.1})\%$, with $r^*_B<15.0\%$ at 90\% confidence
level.

Revisions and Files 1 revised March 1, 2010
File Date
Thumbnails
File Name File Type File Format File Size (Kb) Comments
23-JUN-2010 abstract.tex Abstract txt 2.03
23-JUN-2010 babar-pub-1006.pdf Paper (journal paper or conference submission by BABAR Collaboration) pdf 974.58
23-JUN-2010 babar-pub-1006.ps.gz Paper (journal paper or conference submission by BABAR Collaboration) ps.gz 605.37
23-JUN-2010 fig10.eps Figure or plot eps 16.58 constraints on rB
23-JUN-2010 fig11.eps Figure or plot eps 86.53 deltaB vs gamma
23-JUN-2010 fig12.eps Figure or plot eps 85.83 delta*B vs gamma
23-JUN-2010 fig13.eps Figure or plot eps 19.31 constraints on gamma
23-JUN-2010 fig2a.eps Figure or plot eps 22.26 NN DK signal
23-JUN-2010 fig2b.eps Figure or plot eps 19.78 NN DK bkg OS
23-JUN-2010 fig2c.eps Figure or plot eps 19.87 NN DK bkg SS
23-JUN-2010 fig2d.eps Figure or plot eps 23.33 NN Dpi signal
23-JUN-2010 fig2e.eps Figure or plot eps 19.92 NN Dpi bkg OS
23-JUN-2010 fig2f.eps Figure or plot eps 19.72 NN Dpi bkg SS
23-JUN-2010 fig3a.eps Figure or plot eps 22.05 m_ES D(*)pi
23-JUN-2010 fig3b.eps Figure or plot eps 21.59 m_ES D(*)pi
23-JUN-2010 fig3c.eps Figure or plot eps 21.16 m_ES D(*)pi
23-JUN-2010 fig3d.eps Figure or plot eps 29.47 NN D(*)pi SS
23-JUN-2010 fig3e.eps Figure or plot eps 29.34 NN D(*)pi SS
23-JUN-2010 fig3f.eps Figure or plot eps 29.42 NN D(*)pi SS
23-JUN-2010 fig4a.eps Figure or plot eps 25.88 mes D(*)pi OS
23-JUN-2010 fig4b.eps Figure or plot eps 21.96 mes D(*)pi OS
23-JUN-2010 fig4c.eps Figure or plot eps 23.28 mes D(*)pi OS
23-JUN-2010 fig4d.eps Figure or plot eps 38.71 NN D(*)pi OS
23-JUN-2010 fig4e.eps Figure or plot eps 35.13 NN D(*)pi OS
23-JUN-2010 fig4f.eps Figure or plot eps 38.63 NN D(*)pi OS
23-JUN-2010 fig5a.eps Figure or plot eps 21.89
23-JUN-2010 fig5b.eps Figure or plot eps 20.35
23-JUN-2010 fig5c.eps Figure or plot eps 21.66
23-JUN-2010 fig5d.eps Figure or plot eps 31.42
23-JUN-2010 fig5e.eps Figure or plot eps 33.07
23-JUN-2010 fig5f.eps Figure or plot eps 33.64
23-JUN-2010 fig6a.eps Figure or plot eps 24.78
23-JUN-2010 fig6b.eps Figure or plot eps 22.72
23-JUN-2010 fig6c.eps Figure or plot eps 22.54
23-JUN-2010 fig6d.eps Figure or plot eps 37.46
23-JUN-2010 fig6e.eps Figure or plot eps 35.08
23-JUN-2010 fig6f.eps Figure or plot eps 38.74
23-JUN-2010 fig7a.eps Figure or plot eps 8.70
23-JUN-2010 fig7b.eps Figure or plot eps 9.34
23-JUN-2010 fig7c.eps Figure or plot eps 9.20
23-JUN-2010 fig8a.eps Figure or plot eps 23.58
23-JUN-2010 fig8b.eps Figure or plot eps 22.47
23-JUN-2010 fig8c.eps Figure or plot eps 21.43
23-JUN-2010 fig8d.eps Figure or plot eps 37.88
23-JUN-2010 fig8e.eps Figure or plot eps 35.80
23-JUN-2010 fig8f.eps Figure or plot eps 35.99
23-JUN-2010 fig9a.eps Figure or plot eps 22.89
23-JUN-2010 fig9b.eps Figure or plot eps 22.01
23-JUN-2010 fig9c.eps Figure or plot eps 23.08
23-JUN-2010 fig9d.eps Figure or plot eps 34.87
23-JUN-2010 fig9e.eps Figure or plot eps 34.34
23-JUN-2010 fig9f.eps Figure or plot eps 34.16
23-JUN-2010 figure01a.eps Figure or plot eps 44.40
23-JUN-2010 figure01b.eps Figure or plot eps 44.61
Submitted ToPhysical Review D
Date SubmittedJune 22, 2010
Journal Year2010
Journal Volume82
Journal Article/Page Range072006
Categories
  • AWG: Breco